Madddy,

Do you need us to start working on this 8 pages literature review on the topic slaughter of horses now?

Jeremy

SOC 100 Week 3 Discussion "Agents of Socialization, Economics, Cultural, and Social Capital" Please respond to one (1) of the following: • Go to TED- Website and watch the first two (2) minutes of the video titled,

“How technology allowed me to read (15 min 44 s) located athttp://www.ted.com/talks/ron_mccallum_how_technology_allowed_me_to_read.

Examine one (1) of the six (6) agents of socialization (family, school, peer groups, work, religion, and technology and mass media). Describe the agent of sociology that has changed the most during your lifetime and discuss the importance of this change. • Select one (1) of the following terms: structuralism, economic capital, and social capital, and provide one (1) example of the term using your personal experience, from your family or work environment. Sociology Assignment Help, Sociology Homework help, Sociology Study Help, Sociology Course Help

NEED HELP WITH BLANK BOX QUESTION

(question 1 and 4 in conclusion part. )
* It would be nice if you can check my answeres too.

NOTES:
Tube Sample Lane

1 1 kb DNA ladder 1

2 Mother's DNA 2

3 Child's DNA 3

4 A.F. #1 DNA 4

5 A.F. #2 DNA 5

Record the distance each ladder band moved from the well in mm along with the size of the DNA fragments in that band in bp units, based on the bp given in step 19 , in your Lab Notes.

Lane 1:

1,000 bp 34 mm

900 bp 36 mm

800 bp 38 mm

700 bp 40 mm

600 bp 43 mm

500 bp 47 mm

400 bp 51 mm

300 bp 56 mm

250 bp 60 mm

200 bp 64 mm

150 bp 69 mm

100 bp 77 mm

50 bp 90 mm

Lane 2:

37 mm 850bp

59 mm 265bp

Lane 3:

37 mm 850bp

44 mm 575bp

Lane 4:

41 mm 670bp

43 mm 600bp

Lane 5:

44 mm 575bp

55 mm 320bp

Experiment: Agarose Gel Electrophoresis of DNA Fragments
Lab Results
List the distances traveled in mm for the bands in the DNA ladder in the table below.
Remember, smaller fragments travel farther than longer ones, so the top-most band will be the 1,000 bp sized DNA fragments whereas the bottom-most band will be the 50 bp sized DNA fragments.

CHAPTER 2 • DESIGNING ORGANIZATIONS 25

The strategic plan is based on the organization’s philosophy, vision, and mission. The first steps in strategic planning are:

● Appoint a strategic planning committee ● Interview key stakeholders ● Conduct a SWOT (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats) analysis ● Develop the plan ● Communicate the plan

People who are enthusiastic, experienced, and committed to the organization are the best representatives to serve on the planning committee. Naysayers can be included once some parts of the plan are formulated. Everyone in the organization must be involved even peripherally. “Buy-in” is critical to the plan’s success.

Stakeholders include physicians, administrators, nurses, ancillary and support staff, and community representatives. They will have differing opinions about what the organization can and should do and provide valuable information unavailable elsewhere.

The SWOT analysis includes assessment of the external and internal environment (Kalisch & Curley, 2008). Data is collected from multiple sources, including stakeholder information.

To develop the plan:

Unit5DiscPeerResp2QDA

Response Guidelines

Provide a substantive contribution that advances the discussion in a meaningful way by identifying strengths of the posting, challenging assumptions, and asking clarifying questions. Your response is expected to reference the assigned readings, as well as other theoretical, empirical, or professional literature to support your views and writings. Reference your sources using standard APA guidelines. Review the Participation Guidelines section of the Discussion Participation Scoring Guide to gain an understanding of what is required in a substantive response.

Peer 1 Response: Cait

Anderson & Bushman (2001) conducted the meta-analysis, Effects of Violent Video Games On Aggressive Behavior, Aggressive Cognition, Aggressive Affect, Physiological Arousal, and Prosocial Behavior: A Meta-Analytic Review of the Scientific Literature, which determined that there was a correlation between playing video games and aggressive behaviors. In a set of 21 controlled experimental studies, Anderson & Bushman (2001) concluded that there was a correlation between playing video games (x) and engaging in the aggressive behavior (y). Table 1 determined that aggressive behavior was measured at r= .19, therefore concluding that the correlation was statistically significant due to a large number of participants that were involved in the research study. Aggressive behavior in conjunction with playing violent video games was tested with 3,033 participants. If there was a smaller sample size (in this case, less than 3,033 participants), the correlation r=.19 may not have been as large or as significant. This result also yielded significant results because r=.19 is positive, rather than negative. In Table 1 it can also be determined that the results displayed significant results because of the homogeneity test. The homogeneity test determined an outcome of x2(32) 23.25, p > .05 (Anderson & Bushman, 2001). It was measured that the p score was 23.25, compared to the normal value used by SPSS and researchers, which is .05. Because the p-value was larger than .05, it yielded significant results for this research study. If the p-value was smaller than .05, it would not hold the same level of significance.

Experiment 1: Following Chromosomal DNA Movement through Meiosis Experiment 1: Following Chromosomal DNA Movement through Meiosis

Experiment 1: Observation of Mitosis in a Plant Cell

Data Tables and Post-Lab Assessment

Cell Cycle Division: Mitosis Beads Diagram:

Prophase

Metaphase

Anaphase

Telophase

Cytokinesis

Post-Lab Questions

1. Why are chromosomes important? What information do they provide?

2. How many chromosomes did each of your daughter cells contain?

3. How often do human skin cells divide? Why might that be? Compare this rate to how frequently human neurons divide. What do you notice?

Experiment 1: Following Chromosomal DNA Movement through Meiosis Experiment 1: Following Chromosomal DNA Movement through Meiosis

Experiment 1: Observation of Mitosis in a Plant Cell

Data Tables and Post-Lab Assessment

Table 1: Mitosis Predictions

Predictions:

Supporting Evidence

Table 2: Mitosis Data

Number of Cells in Each Stage

Total Number of Cells

Calculated % of Time Spent in Each Stage

Interphase:

Interphase:

Prophase:

14

Prophase: 20

Metaphase:

19

Metaphase: 30

Anaphase:

19

In this experiment, you will dialyze a solution of glucose and starch to observe:

The directional movement of glucose and starch.
The effect of a selectively permeable membrane on the diffusion of these molecules.
An indicator is a substance that changes color when in the presence of a specific substance. In this experiment, IKI will be used as an indicator to test for the presence of starch.

Materials

(5) 100 mL Beakers
10 mL 1% Glucose Solution, C6H12O6
4 Glucose Test Strips
(1) 100 mL Graduated Cylinder
4 mL 1% Iodine-Potassium Iodide, IKI
5 mL Liquid Starch, C6H10O5
3 Pipettes
4 Rubber Bands (Small; contain latex, handle with gloves on if allergic)

Permanent Marker
*Stopwatch
*Water
*Scissors

*15.0 cm Dialysis Tubing

*You Must Provide
*Be sure to measure and cut only the length you need for this experiment. Reserve the remainder for later experiments.

Attention!

Do not allow the open end of the dialysis tubing to fall into the beaker. If it does, remove the tube and rinse thoroughly with water before refilling it with the starch/glucose solution and replacing it in the beaker.

Note:

If you make a mistake, the dialysis tubing can be rinsed and used again.

Dialysis tubing must be soaked in water before you will be able to open it up to create the dialysis “bag.” Follow these directions for this experiment:

1. Soak the tubing in a beaker of water for ten minutes.

2. Place the dialysis tubing between your thumb and forefinger, and rub the two digits together in a shearing manner. This motion should open up the “tube” so that you can fill it with the different solutions.

Glacier Lab Handout.pdf
Chapter13.pdf
1 13 Glaciers and the Dynamic Cryosphere C O N T R I B U T I N G A U T H O R S

Sharon Laska • Acadia University

Kenton E. Strickland • Wright State University–Lake Campus

Nancy A. Van Wagoner • Acadia University

L A B O R A T O R Y

BIG IDEAS Earth’s crysphere is its snow and ice (frozen water),

including permafrost, sea ice, mountain glaciers,

continental ice sheets, and the polar ice caps. The extent

of snow and ice in any given area depends on how much

snow and ice accumulates during winter months and

how much snow and ice melts during summer months.

Glaciers are one of the best known components of the

cryosphere, because they are present on all continents

except Australia and have created characteristic

landforms and resources utilized by many people.

The Final Report must be word-processed in Times New Roman, 11 pt font, 1.5 spaced, with page
numbers, and contain references to your sources. Ideally students should use a Royal Society of
Chemistry Template as used for example in “Chemical Society Reviews”.
Details of these can be found at;
http://www.rsc.org/Publishing/Journals/guidelines/AuthorGuidelines/AuthoringTools/Templates/w
ord.asp
In terms of content, the final report should contain:
 A front cover with the literature project title, student name, student number, and supervisor
name.

Outline for Research paper—Physician assisted suicide, state or federal issue?

Introduction:

• Overview on what physician assisted suicide is so that my reader can understand it.
• Present the current laws on it
• Explain that physician assisted suicide is currently a state law and not a federal law
• Define what it means to be a federal law
• Define what it means to be a state law (common law)
• Present a small amount of information on how physician assisted suicide is handled in other countries as well as in the Unites States to help give information on the topic.

Interview someone about how their cultural background has influenced their schooling, learning, interests, and/ or academic achievement. Focus on cultural background, not family background or personal interests. Use topics from our readings to inform your interview questions and especially to support your analysis.

(1)Description. Provides a concrete description of the interview including DETAILS and verbatim dialogue clearly illustrating for the reader what was said in the interview. 1-page

(2)Analysis. Accurately explains, analyzes, and interprets interview responses. Shows how the interview responses support (or contradict) concepts and theory discussed in the text and class discussion. Shows insight and deep thinking. There are no obvious topics the manuscript should have described but did not. Explicitly cites pages in relevant course articles. 3 pages.

Question

Instructions

This essay should be a 600-900 word essay

• This should be a close reading

essay, and should use as evidence primarily passages from the work or works that you discuss. You may not use ANY outside sources without the instructor's approval.

• The essay should be in MLA essay format (see the attached sample essay below), and use MLA citations. A works cited entry and in-text citations for each text discussed are required.

• It should have a self-assessment (which should answer these questions) as the first page.

• Analytical essays should be focused on making a debatable claim about the work in question; creative essays should be focused on presenting a work or kind of work from a different angle. Informational essays or essays consisting of summary are not appropriate for either type of essay. Both types of essay should be supported with discussion of specific passages from the text(s) on which the essay is focused. The essay grading rubric can be found here for the analytical choices, and here for the creative choices.

DISCLAIMER: Originality of attachments will be verified by Turnitin.

Choose 1 of the following topics from either the Analytical or Creative categories. For the analytical choices, be sure to write a thesis-driven essay in response to the topic. Creative choices should be written as narratives.

Analytical Choices

1. Defining the Sacred: choose 2 sacred works that we have read, 1 from the two Abrahamic faiths (Islam and Christianity) and 1 from the Eastern religions (Hinduism, Buddhism, and Confucianism) and make an argument about what similarities they have, and what those similarities can tell us about what it means for a work to be “sacred.”

2. Tragedy Across the Mediterranean: Consider “The Tale of Sohrab” from the Shahnameh in comparison to Oedipus Tyrannus from the Week 2 readings. Make an argument about whether the two works are more alike or different and why. Focus your thesis on one particular aspect of the two works such as protagonists, themes, central conflicts, or other another element that you see as important.

Creative Choices

1. The Tale as Told by Another Character: Re-write 1 of our readings from the point of view of a character other than the original protagonist/main character (you may use any of the fiction—Jataka Tales, Oedipus Tyrannus, The Lay of Lanval, The Tale of Genji—for this, but write it as a short story). Make your new version no more than 900 words (Part 1). Also include a follow-up personal essay of about 200 words (Part 2) that explains why you made the choices you did in presenting your new version of the story.

2. In the Style Of . . . : Choose 1 work from our readings and re-write in the style of another work we read (for instance, re-write part of a Jataka Tale as a play, part of the Bhagavad Gita as a Confucian-style set of sayings, or some part of The Lay of Lanval as a poem in the style of Li Bai). Make your new version no more than 900 words (Part 1). Also include a follow-up personal essay of about 200 words (Part 2) that explains why you made the choices you did in presenting your new version of the story.

3. A Tale for Our Time: choose 1 work from Weeks 3-6 and write a version of it that is aimed at a modern audience. For instance, what would The Art of Courtly Love be like if Andreas Cappellanus were writing for Millennials? What sort of tale might the Buddha have told about an earlier incarnation if he had been born at the end of the 20th century? Make your new version no more than 900 words (Part 1). Also include a follow-up personal essay of about 200 words (Part 2) that explains why you made the choices you did in presenting your new version of the story.

 ATTACHMENT PREVIEW Download attachment

Heckel 1Annie HeckelProfessor HarperLITR20128 September 2014Dear Professor Harper,I decided to write on the dharma inThe SakuntalaandThe Ramayanaprompt because Ifound it very interesting how these two works use the concept in parallel but different ways. Iwanted to try to articulate what those differences were in my paper. I did not have to choose whatworks to write on, but I did enjoy reading these two works. I think my essay is strong because ithas a good thesis and I keep the focus of the essay on that thesis all the way through. I think thatI also chose strong examples from both works to use as support. The area that I think may beweak is in the analysis of my evidence, and I would like feedback on that. Did I explain theevidence well enough, or are there still some parts of it that need to be better explained?-Annie

View the Answer

Heckel 2Annie HeckelProfessor HarperLITR20128 September 2014Love Over All: Love’s Triumph Over Dharma inThe SakuntalaIn Hindu culture and belief, the idea of “dharma” or duty is an important concept thatshapes the life of individuals on many levels. When viewed through the lens of an individual’scaste, it dictates what sorts of work that individual can do, as well as how the person mustrespond to others of higher or lower castes, something we see inThe Sakuntalain the scene withthe fisherman. In the individual’s personal life, dharma can require a person to respond in certainways to family members or other members of society, as shown in the section ofThe Ramayanawhere King Dasaratha must grant Queen Kaikeyi’s request that he exile his beloved son Ramaeven though the exile is unfair and against Dasaratha’s wishes. When consideringThe SakuntalaandThe Ramayanatogether, however, there are significant differences in the role that dharmaplays in the story. Duty in theSakuntalais more of backdrop in the setting of the story, anassumed quantity, and only when it is violated does it really become noticeable. Rather than theemphasis being on dharma, as it is inThe Ramayana, the main focus ofThe Sakuntalais on love,and dharma’s influence is secondary to the power of love.Early on inThe Sakuntala, we do see dharma featured as a way to establish the maincharacters as upright and good people. Dushyanta's acquiescence to the hermits' requests, anddeference to the hermits is an example of this (Kalidasa 379-382). Dushyanta’s honorableresponse to the hermits, who as priests are of a higher social status than Dushyanta, can be seen

Below are some articles that may help with your PY 490 paper.  I have attached the PDF files with relevant section headings highlighted in yellow.

In reviewing the literature, it is mentioned that the etiology of SAD and working mechanism of light are still unknown.  This may be a possible approach to writing your paper (see below).  The article by Meesters from 2016 sort of takes this approach.  Since nobody understands how this works, most of the current research is focused on trying to figure it out.

What is SAD?  (explain disorder)

The laws of segregation, independent assortment, and dominance, discovered in the mid 19th century by Gregor Mendel, form the basis of all genetics. The ability to predict the results of crossing experiments and explain any variance between expected and observed results is still a vital part of our understanding of heredity. The relationship between the genotype and the phenotype of an organism is now understood with better clarity than it was in the early part of the 20th century. Today our ability to determine gene sequences in individual organisms and populations of organisms has allowed us to deepen our understanding of heredity. In this lab assignment you will experiment with monohybrid crosses and explore the role of chance in genetics.

I have already started the lab work

Lab Template

Week 5: Mendelian Genetics

Submitted by:

As you complete the lab, record your answers in this template. Save the document as LastName_FirstName_BIO1020_W5A3, and submit it to the Dropbox. Full lab instructions and the rubric with which you will be evaluated can be found in the online classroom.

The original organic solution was extracted two times with aqueous sodium 1. The original organic...
The original organic solution was extracted two times with aqueous sodium

1. The original organic solution was extracted two times with aqueous sodium bicarbonate. After the extraction, what compound(s) were in the organic layer? What compound(s) were in the aqueous layer? ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 2. Assume that both acetylsalicylic acid and acetanilide are soluble in diethyl ether, and that diethyl ether was used in place of the methylene chloride. Would the ether layer be the bottom layer in the separatory funnel or the top layer? Explain your answer. ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 3. Assume that both acetylsalicylic acid and acetanilide are soluble in methanol, and that methanol was used in place of the methylene chloride. What problem(s) might occur during the extractions? (Careful, this is a trick question.) ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 4. Historically, the solid residue that is left after the methylene chloride solution is evaporated has a lower melting point that its literature value, due to impurities. Explain what impurities are present and why. ____________________________________________________________________________________________________

The United States population

This contains 100% correct material for UMUC Biology 103 LAB03. However, this is an Answer Key, which means, you should put it in your own words. Here is a sample for the Pre lab questions answered:

Pre-Lab Questions

1. Identify the major similarities and differences between prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells. (2 pts)

Prokaryotes tend to be less complex than eukaryotic cells, with fewer organelles and (generally) fewer requirements for survival. Eukaryotes have a nucleus, while prokaryotes do not. Both eukaryotes and prokaryotes have DNA, a cell membrane, and cytoplasm.

2. Where is the DNA housed in a prokaryotic cell? Where is it housed in a eukaryotic cell? (2 pts)

DNA is housed in the nucleus in eukaryotic cells. Prokaryotic cells do not have a nucleus, and thus DNA exists freely in the cytoplasm.

3. Identify three structures which provide support and protection in a eukaryotic cell. (2 pts)

The cell membrane, the cytoplasm, and the cytoskeleton (microtubules, microfilaments, etc.).

The rest of the questions are answered as well:

Week 6 Benchmark - Drafting a Literature Review
Week 6 Assignment Instructions

Tutor MUST have a good command of the English language

Tutor MUST have a good command of the English language

Sources need to be less than five years old and journal/scholarly articles.

Use only articles that are published between 2014-2018 (except for your theory articles which will be older as you must cite primary sources).

No textbook or direct quotes

Rubric Requirements must be met

This is a continuation of the literature review that is attached. The new assignment needs to be added to the attached document.

In this assignment, you will draft the body of a literature review. You will continue to add and revise this draft literature review (Chapter 2 of your DPI Project) as you progress through the program. You may be able to use the feedback and suggestions from your instructor (on the Introduction to the Literature Review assignment in Topic 4) to expand the literature review for this assignment.

General Requirements:

Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:

· Use the "Empirical Research Checklist" worksheet to ensure that each article you select meets all of the established criteria.

· Use the "Research Article Chart" to provide a summary review of each component of your assignment.

· Submit the completed Research Article Chart to your instructor.

· Refer to the most recent prospectus template found in the DC Network (dc.gcu.edu) for details and criteria for the Literature Review (Chapter 2).

· Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

· This assignment uses a rubric. Please Review the rubric prior to the beginning to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

· You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.

Directions:

Part 1: Selection of 15 Articles

Select 15 empirical articles related to your PICOT question. Use the "Empirical Research Checklist" worksheet to ensure that each article you select meets all of the established criteria. At least one article must demonstrate a quantitative methodology.

Part 2: Research Article Chart

Using the articles acquired in Part 1, provide a summary review of each component using the "Research Article Chart" template.

Part 3: Literature Review

Prepare a Literature Review (Chapter 2) of 2,000-3,000 words for your scholarly project.

Utilizing the major concepts identified in the Topic 4 assignment, further develop each major concept and subtheme by locating 15 more empirical articles related to your project topic (30 articles total: 15 from Topic 4 assignment and 15 from Topic 6 assignment).

Use the "Research Article Chart" as a guide to analyze and synthesize (summarize) the literature into the paper you began in the Topic 4 assignment.

Based upon your review of the 15 additional research articles, expand on your summary of each major concept and your synthesis of the three identified subthemes that support each concept. At the end of each major concept, include a summary statement.

Apply Rubrics

Benchmark - Drafting a Literature Review

1 Unsatisfactory 0.00%

2 Less Than Satisfactory 74.00%

3 Satisfactory 79.00%

4 Good 87.00%

5 Excellent 100.00%

70.0 %Content

20.0 %Identification of Major Concept and Related Scholarly Sources (C.5.1)

The identification of major concept and related scholarly sources is either missing or incomplete.

Major concept to be included in the literature review are present, but the sources cited do not relate to the concept or are not from scholarly sources.

Major concept to be included in the literature review are present, and the sources cited distantly relate to the concept. Sources cited are from both scholarly and nonscholarly sources.

Major concept to be included in the literature review are present, and the sources cited relate to the concept. Sources cited are from scholarly sources though some sources may be outdated.

Major concept to be included in the literature review are present, and the sources cited directly and clearly relate to the concept. Sources cited are from current scholarly sources.

30.0 %Identification of Subtopic, Related Scholarly Sources, and Quantitative Research Elements (C.5.1)

The identification of subthemes, related scholarly sources, and quantitative research elements is either missing or incomplete.

Subthemes to be included in the literature review are present, but the sources cited do not relate to the themes or are not from scholarly sources. The quantitative research elements are incorrectly identified.

Subthemes to be included in the literature review are present, and the sources cited distantly relate to the themes. Sources cited are from both scholarly and nonscholarly sources. The quantitative research elements are correctly identified.

Subthemes to be included in the literature review are present, and the sources cited relate to the themes. Sources cited are from scholarly sources though some sources may be outdated. The quantitative research elements are correctly identified.

Subthemes to be included in the literature review are present, and the sources cited directly and clearly relate to the themes. Sources cited are from current scholarly sources. The quantitative research elements are correctly identified.

20.0 %Synthesis of the Research in Each Subtheme (C.5.1)

The synthesis of the research in each subtheme is either missing or does not address all of the required components.

The synthesis of the research in each subtheme incompletely or inaccurately conveys to the reader what is known and what is not known. It does not demonstrate that the learner has a solid grasp of existing literature on the topic.

The synthesis of the research in each subtheme provides a cursory review that conveys to the reader what is known and what is not known. It demonstrates a superficial understanding of existing literature on the topic.

The synthesis of the research in each subtheme provides a solid review that conveys to the reader what is known and what is not known. It demonstrates a moderate understanding of existing literature on the topic.

The synthesis of the research in each subtheme provides a thorough review that conveys to the reader what is known and what is not known. It demonstrates a thorough grasp of existing literature on the topic.

20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness

7.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose

Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.

Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.

Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.

Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.

Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

8.0 %Argument Logic and Construction

Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.

Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.

Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.

Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.

Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

10.0 %Format

5.0 %Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.

Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.

Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.

Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.

All format elements are correct.

5.0 %Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)

Sources are not documented.

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

100 %Total Weightage

Based on the required topic study materials, write a reflection about worldview and respond to following:

In 250-300 words, explain the Christian perspective of the nature of spirituality and ethics in contrast to the perspective of postmodern relativism within health care.

In 250-300 words, explain what scientism is and describe two of the main arguments against it.

In 750-1,000 words, answer each of the worldview questions according to your own personal perspective and worldview: (a) What is ultimate reality? (b) What is the nature of the universe? (c) What is a human being? (d) What is knowledge? (e) What is your basis of ethics? (f) What is the purpose of your existence?

Remember to support your reflection with the topic study materials. While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines.